BBC Brainwashing & Behaviour Control
The BBC has been an integral part of repeated
In fact, during the General Strike of 1926, the BBC played a crucial role in breaking the strike. They lied to the public about the number of striking railwaymen. They also refused to allow the Archbishop of Canterbury to air his suggestion to resolve the strike.
In addition to that, all news had to be vetted by John Davidson, chairman of the Conservative Party. He refused any air time to Labour M.P.s or Trades Union officials.
Then as now, when it comes to framing the public’s perceptions, that which is omitted is as important as that which is included. Propaganda was one of the earliest functions of the BBC. Its headquarters were established at Broadcasting House in Westminster, and that gives us a clue as to who runs the show.
Paedophiles appear to have haunted their corridors (and our screens) almost since its inception, and the list of child abusers who have worked for the BBC is as long as the list of child-abusing M.P.s. (Well, almost)
You know all the most famous – but it’s not just the major celebs who have been doing it. People in every area of BBC television and radio have been involved in, or at least turned a blind eye to, so many immoral and deviant behaviours for years.
Nah! sorry, this is boring, we know what’s been going on, there’s no point in me repeating what you know already.
Between the BBC and Westminster, there is no way of getting to the facts. It’s cover up after cover up, each one covering the other’s arse, making sure the truth can’t sodomise either one of them.
But if, God forbid, there was serious criminality happening at the highest levels of society, and involving some of the most prominent people in the world, there is no way that these crimes could be admitted publicly.
It would bring the whole established order to its knees. We would lose faith in our betters.
Criminals and abusers
Who would vote for the pig poking P.M.? Oh, I guess some of you did.
How about the child molesting Education Minister, and his friend the porn peddling Minister for Digital, Culture, and Media, (broadcasting and internet).
The sheep shagging Minister of Agriculture would soon be out of his post.
While the human trafficker and smack smuggler – the Minister for International Trade – would have to traffic himself, and the tax dodging Treasury Minister out of the country, to avoid a lynching.
These are only hypothetical, but it would not be the first time that a fox has been put in charge of the chickens. In fact, in many ways, it seems to be the way the world is run. The most unsuitable people are attracted to the most unsuitable positions – they can always be relied upon to keep quiet, and they’re very easy to blackmail.
If the public was properly informed of the bizarre sexual practices of certain members of our beloved royal family, then we would put them either in prison or an insane asylum.
The rich and famous have important jobs running the country and being famous, they cannot be challenged on the details of their personal life. Not while they are alive anyway.
Therefore there is no way that the Government controlled BBC would ever be allowed to tell the truth… about anything.
Look at David Cameron and the pig-gate debacle. ‘I did not have sexual relations with that pig’s head.’ As though putting his not so honourable member in its mouth isn’t as depraved as if he’d put it in the ‘other end’.
They made a big deal about the pig being dead – apparently, that also made the act less disgusting. Well if it had been a human head that he’d poked his penis into, would it have been less or more disgusting if the person was dead?
Excuse me for asking, but how aroused was he when the alleged incident occurred? I can’t be the only person to wonder if he had a hard-on while performing said act. To my mind, there’s a world of difference between a floppy and a woody in those circumstances.
If he was erect, then he was turned on, and that’s a scary thought. Do you really want a man who can get a hard cock from a pig’s head as your M.P.? – You certainly wouldn’t want him as your head-chef.
He has never denied having an erection during the aforementioned deed, so perhaps this can be viewed as an admission of guilt.
So what is the meaning of the word ‘programme’?
according to the English Oxford living Dictionary
Programme means :
a) A set of related measures or activities with a particular long-term aim.
c) A series of coded software instructions to control the operation of a computer or other machine (or people?).
a) Provide (a computer or other machine – or viewer) with coded instructions for the automatic performance of a task.
b) Input (instructions for the automatic performance of a task) into a computer or other machine (or person).
c) Cause (a person or animal) to behave in a predetermined way. (the italics are mine).
So when you look at some of those meanings with a cynical eye, an innocent-sounding word such as ‘programme’ becomes much more insidious.
Come on, you didn’t really think television was for your entertainment.