A smack in everyone’s face

So why are street drugs illegal. I understand with so-called ‘legal highs’ etc., nobody knows what they might do to a person, particularly with long term use. We need to be cautious to protect the young from unknown and untested drugs.

But as for the good old fashioned types – which can be bought on the corner of most high streets in Britain nowadays – why are they illegal?


For now, let’s look at one of the most pernicious of street drugs – heroin. It’s obviously an extremely addictive drug, and I really do not recommend that anyone takes it without a prescription. It is a marvellous pain killer and used in hospitals across the land every day.

Far less damaging than methadone

Roads to Hell

So it’s not that dangerous when used properly. The greatest threat to the public comes from its addictiveness and the stronger drugs (eg. fentanyl) that it’s sometimes mixed with.

So how do people become addicts? A certain number get hooked on prescribed morphine from a doctor or hospital. Apparently, after using it for three consecutive days it becomes very difficult to stop. But I don’t believe that’s how most people begin their addiction.

The majority of heroin users were introduced to it by a ‘friend’ or acquaintance who was already working in the ‘heroin industry’.
From pimps to pushers, and users to usurers, it’s been employed as a tool for exploiting the vulnerable for years. While it’s precursor – opium – has been used the same way for hundreds, or possibly thousands of years. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Opium-Warshttps://www.taxjustice.net/2015/02/27/hsbc-and-the-worlds-oldest-drug-cartel/

If there’s profit to be made – there’s a bank involved somewhere

It’s always been expensive stuff, and not easy to afford if you are unemployed or homeless. So how can someone afford to support such a serious habit when they are skint?

Means to an end

Some will shoplift or commit streetcrime, and some will rob houses. Probably the saddest of all, are those who are forced into and trapped in prostitution, by their habit. Many children are deliberately turned into addicts, and forced to work in the sex industry to pay for it. While migrants are smuggled into the country, forcibly addicted to heroin, and made to work as sex-slaves.

Rental slavery

If you use prostitutes then you are part of the problem. But I don’t suppose you’d care – you see people as commodities anyway. If you just stayed in and had a wank then this dreadful exploitation of human beings would not be happening. Or even better – try to form meaningful relationships with the people around you. You never know, one of them might like you enough to actually want to have sex with you.


But the simplest way of supporting a habit is to deal the stuff; it probably seems like it’s the most moral option too. The majority of people would choose not to steal, whereas heroin dealing is a logical extension of capitalism. Supply and demand.
Buying low and selling high, making a profit on each transaction. Possibly cutting it with brick dust or rat poison, or even other pharmaceutical opioids to make it more potent. Sounds like a typical entrepreneur – Alan Sugar would be proud – and the Dragons Den should embrace them.


Do we want a solution?

It seems to me that those already addicted are stuck between a rock and a hard place. Deal, kneel or steal – what a choice.

Surely the answer to many of society’s drug-related problems is for registered heroin addicts to be able to receive safe pharmaceutical grade heroin, from a specially registered doctor, who is authorised to prescribe it on the N.H.S.

Just think about it. If junkies got a regular safe supply from a doctor – for the price of a prescription – there’d be no need for them to deal the stuff to fund their habit.
Furthermore, they wouldn’t be trying to lure kids into a life of smack, and addicts wouldn’t need to go out on the rob or sell their bodies to pay for the gear. This would massively curtail the power of the vicious drug and sex gangs.


A life in a box

Let’s face it nobody starts taking heroin when they are at a good place in their life. It’s a desperate situation that gets people started. Morphine is a painkiller – I believe it mitigates against mental, emotional, and physical pain – which is why it becomes so popular with people who are suffering. Sadly it seems to be so effective that people get hooked very quickly.

I admit I’m no expert, and I have never knowingly taken it – well maybe once in the nineties, in a ‘brown speckled dove’. I have lost friends to heroin. I’ve known users and ex-users – smokers and injectors – and most of them were decent enough people.
Nobody wants to end up as a smack-head and social pariah, but it could happen to anyone. Heroin does not discriminate, it just requires a person to have had enough pain, misery or bad luck in their life – and for it to be offered to them at the wrong time.

Not that sort of speckled dove

A small aside

My daughter fell off a swing and broke her arm when she was about 8 years old. An ambulance was called, and when they turned up they offered her morphine as a pain killer. Okay, so far. But as they were administering it, the paramedics were telling her ‘You’ll like this, it will make you feel really nice’.

They were right, she did like it – she still remembers the high. But how responsible is it for paramedics to act like the morphine marketing team? I know they were doing their job – and generally doing it very well – but should they be telling children, ‘this is morphine it’s really nice, you’ll enjoy it’. For that could very well be the first step on the road to addiction, for an injured impressionable child.
My daughter still remembers the effect, and that was more than 10 years ago.

Time to change the paradigm

Pins and needles

Imagine if heroin was available on prescription, from a doctor and specialist, surely crime rates would plummet. Police resources could be redeployed, and there would be far fewer new addicts.
The users could be helped to use it safely, and programmes could be put in place to help addicts quit.

If they did quit, there would not be the pressure from fellow addicts, and old patterns of behaviour, to lure them back. There would also be little financial incentive for old acquaintances to reintroduce them to that paradoxical drug.

Chase jobs not dragons

Apparently, heroin doesn’t necessarily impair your ability to work, so perhaps addicts could be helped to find gainful employment – if they weren’t running around all day chasing their next dragon.
It all just seems so simple.

The heroin – like most street drugs – is not brought into the country by junkies. It is imported by businessmen, with money and connections, who make a profit from the misery of others. Capitalism and moral bankruptcy is the cause, wasted lives the effect.

Who benefits?

If we remove the possibility of outrageous profit from a drug, it ceases to be of interest to the wealthy parasites who currently prosper from the vile business. Unfortunately, those who profit the most from the illegal drugs trade, are the same financial elite who profit from all the other immoral industries. These same people also have tremendous influence over governments and lawmakers.

The crown estates

Ultimately, those at the top of the illegal heroin trade, have too much to lose from making it available on prescription. It’s a similar situation to alcohol prohibition in the U.S.A. in the 1920s. The gangsters make a fortune, and the criminals for whom the gangsters work, are the people who make the laws. They just get the ‘lower orders’ to do all the dirty work for them.

For example, they currently have squaddies guarding their poppy crops in Iraq and Afghanistan. The invasion of those countries wasn’t only about securing the oil supply, avenging 911, expanding Greater Israel, threatening Russia, training terrorists, creating a climate of instability and insecurity thus increasing arms sales, shoring up the petrodollar, and prosecuting an insane Holy war.

So useful but so easy to misuse

Nothing new under the sun

A similar thing happened with America in the Korean and Vietnam wars. These wars allowed the U.S.A. access to a rich source of the drug – the golden triangle – which produced most of the world’s opium in the 1950s and 60s. The C.I.A. imported the heroin to the States in bulk, via Air America, to fund their ‘black ops’ in other parts of the world. The Hells Angels – largely made up of war veterans – were integrated by the C.I.A. as a supply chain for this illegally imported drug.

The Golden Triangle[1] is the area where the borders of Thailand, Laos, and Myanmar meet at the confluence of the Ruak and Mekong Rivers en.wikipedia.

There is evidence that all the above happened, but what is provably true, is difficult to say. However, there could not have been any illegal drug industries without involvement from those with connections in very high places.

Free country

When was the last time some cheeky little twat answered his accusers with the sentence “it’s a free country”. We used to say it regularly if anyone tried to stop us from doing what we wanted.

Is it still a free country?

I think, as children, we had an instinctive feeling for ‘common law’, at least for right and wrong. Therefore, we knew if we didn’t cause harm to anyone, then most things were okay. We went where we wanted, and if we didn’t steal or damage anything, we felt justified in doing whatever we liked.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying we never nicked or broke anything, and fuck, we lit a lot of fires. But it was the principle that ’it’s a free country!’ that was important to us. It somehow gave us a feeling of pride.

Does the sight of armed police make you feel secure? It scares the shit out of me

Nowadays there is not that sense of freedom. Coppers with guns wandering around our cities, CCTV in every shop and on every corner. Strict searches upon entering any large public event. I don’t know about you but I feel violated – it lowers the human spirit. Bit by bit we are having our basic freedoms removed, all in the name of terrorism.

Big brother and his big brothers

What makes a terrorist?

Call me cynical, but what is a terrorist?
Would we even have terrorists, if we weren’t exporting our ‘freedoms’ and stealing other’s resources? Why does anyone become a suicide bomber? How pissed off do you have to be, to strap explosives to your body and blow yourself up? Or to fly a plane into a skyscraper – if you choose to believe that story.

Who funds the terrorists?

There is more and more information coming out that the major backers of terror are the West’s own security services. https://www.theguardian.

Is this man a war criminal or a terrorist or both?

Photo by Paul Morse,

State terror

Now that’s what I call a terrorist. Yes, and he’s a war criminal too

‘Terrorism, the systematic use of violence to create a general climate of fear in a population and thereby to bring about a particular political objective. Terrorism has been practised by political organisations with both rightist and leftist objectives, by nationalistic and religious groups, by revolutionaries, and even by state institutions such as armies, intelligence services, and police.’

By that very definition, this is exactly what the British Government have been doing for hundreds of years, both domestically and abroad.
For example:

‘Between 1728 and the devastating hunger of 1845-50, there were 28 artificial famines in Ireland that cost the lives of half a million Irish. Throughout this period, Ireland had produced enough food to feed her native population twice over, but almost all of it was being exported, under force of arms, by the English.’ https://www.sott.net/article/245044-The-British-Empire-A-Lesson-In-State-Terrorism

They probably think they are being patriotic

What are the causes of terrorism?

‘British military officers and Special Forces are reportedly training – in Jordanian territory – foreign-backed militants to step up their campaign of terrorism across Syria. Ample evidence shows that the mercenaries, recruited from various countries including Libya, Saudi Arabia and Iraq, are covertly supplied with weapons and training from the US, Britain and France via the conduits of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey.’ http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article33327.htm (it appears this article is no longer available)

However, you don’t have to look far to find British and U.S. involvement in supporting terrorism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_involvement_in_the_Syrian_Civil_War . It may seem that these actions of the British Government are conducted far from home, but do you believe they would never do such a thing in the U.K.

Controlled opposition is the way the powers that be, maintain mastery over both sides in a dispute. They set up and support all the protagonists in any major confrontation, Whatever the outcome, they win. Call me Cynical again, but are the so-called terrorist groups just pawns in a sick geopolitical game?

Why can’t we live in peace?

Anyone remember free speech?

Now you don’t even have the right of freedom of speech. Even if what you are saying is absolutely true, you do not have the right to say it in case it offends someone. I’m with Steve Hughes on this one.
No-one was ever harmed by being offended. There are wars, famines, genocide, unlawful imprisonment, the bombing of civilians etc. happening around the world right now, and people are more concerned about having hurt feelings.


What sort of society do we live in that takes itself so seriously that we can’t take the piss out of each other? It’s tragic.

It’s very important in human culture to have a close friend who is a complete fucking idiot. Every group of chums should have at least one shit-for-brains among them. If you don’t think you have a total fuckwit amongst your friends, then maybe you should look in the mirror – I think he might be there.

Childish can sometimes be amusing too

Almost all humour is at someone’s expense. I believe that’s because we are human, and modern humans are a particularly amusing but stupid species. How often would we chuckle in a day if we didn’t laugh at each other? Whether it’s how daft we behave, or talk, or dress, or misunderstand etc. etc.

Sometimes we amuse people intentionally, and on other occasions, it’s an embarrassing accident. Often, it is the most inappropriate and disgusting things which we find the funniest.

Is it a bad thing to be laughed at if it makes others happy?

Surely what is important about what a person says, is the intent behind the words. If you are bullying or intending to cause or incite actual harm to someone – don’t do it you prick.But if you’re just expressing an opinion, or maybe even having a laugh…

Don’t believe me

I can respect a person’s beliefs even when they’re wrong. I think it’s vital to have a value system that you can call your own. You live your life, you learn your lessons, and decide through personal experience what is true or good or right. You make up your own mind. Never let anyone else tell you what to believe – unless you have no regard for your own intelligence. This is particularly true of religion when it contradicts your own moral awareness.


Certainly, the God of the Old Testament was a bit of a psycho. However, there have been many other violent and vengeful gods, in various religions and civilisations, across the globe – gods & bloodthirsty-rituals
Surely none of these petty, tribal, and violent gods can ever be the ‘One True God’ of monotheism.

Kuka’ilimoku: War God of Kamehameha

My point is, that unless a being is more morally developed than I am, I could never call it God. If I can judge Yahweh/Jehovah as childish, spiteful and brutal, then it seems unlikely that he really is God.
Surely one should never be able to take the moral high ground with one’s god – at least I hope not, or I’m fucked.

Moses was a horny bastard


Why allow priests of any religion, or books of any one faith to frame your idea of Deity? God can be anything you or anyone else can imagine It to be. No-one knows – least of all a priest, who has forsaken his family and friends, along with all the normal loving relationships of human life. Nevertheless, by rejecting orthodox religion, be careful not to throw out the baby Jesus with the holy-bathwater.

Each and every priest has his own personal view of what God is.
The same as everyone has – whether they believe in Him/Her/It/Them or not.
Even if you don’t believe in God or the Gods then you must have an idea of what it is that you reject. So ‘God’ is your own personalised abstract concept, and you decide whether or not you believe in it.

Drink my blood… Suck it from my throbbing vein

How can you argue with anyone other than yourself about your own abstract ideas? A person should explore their own existence in the universe, and find what is true for them. Not bicker with others about their beliefs.

Do you have you a relationship with some form of higher consciousness/intelligence or not? If not, do you feel a deep love for the earth or nature, or humanity or with anything at all? If you feel no strong connection with other living beings, then perhaps you are an aristocrat or even royalty? You should certainly vote Conservative at the next election.


Surely it’s a wonderful thing to have a relationship with a part of the cosmos that appears to be ‘not me’. Something other than self.
Each particle in the universe is connected to every other particle, in some way or other. From atoms to galaxies, and microbes to monsters, they are all in inter-linked.

It follows then, that we humans are too – on physical, emotional, electrical, chemical, psychical, mental, and on who knows what other levels. Furthermore, this means that you and I are connected too… (now, how embarrassing is that?).

There is nothing separate in the universe. (Okay, maybe Theresa May)


I would suppose that a person’s concept of God would be that of the highest ‘power’ that she/he could imagine.
The human being can create anything the human mind can conceptualise. This, I believe, is where all the gods and demons of religion originated. We invented them.
‘All gods are homemade, and it is we who pull their strings, and so, give them the power to pull ours.’ Aldous Huxley.


So was life imagined into being by a great Mind hidden deep within the folds of the imperceivable universe? In the same way that humans can imagine music, art or machinery, into existence, so all creation begins in the mind. Amazingly these inventions of the mind can continue long after their creators have been forgotten.

Look what our corporations are paying people to imagine into the world now – weapons, artificial intelligences, poisons, g.m.o.s, etc.. But most worrying for me at the moment, are the insidious methods of subduing and stupifying the population.

We have t.v., internet legislation, 5g technology (please check it out), terrorism, education, science, religion, government, street drugs, legal drugs, alcohol; the list is almost endless. That’s not even including the so-called ‘conspiracy theories’, of fluoride, chemtrails, vaccines, microwave technologies, false flag events, etc.. All and any of the above can have the effect of making us docile, unquestioning, and obedient.

If we keep bleating loud enough maybe we’ll get another referendum on our choice of abattoir

Who in this world really loves and cares for you? Is it the executives running the corporations, or those in positions of political power perhaps? Don’t be a twat! – The Tories don’t love you, Labour doesn’t love you, and the E.U. certainly doesn’t love you. None of those wankers is doing their job for your benefit. They are tiny cogs in an enormous machine that will scrap them as soon as they are of no use to it. And you and I, my friend, are even less important than they are.

Oh I’m sorry, did I disturb you? No, I didn’t think so – everything’s fine, go back to sleep.

The joy of dog walking

I was out for a walk the other day, with my dog, when she stopped and squatted. Her back end quivered, and joy of joys, I realised she was having a poo.
Sod’s law, we were on a footpath and it naturally fell to me to pick up her excrement. It’s most unpleasant when it’s still steaming and squishy, in your hands when you haven’t got a bag with you. Fortunately, I had one that day. But it still it feels very wrong – as if you are picking up warm fresh dog logs with bare hands.

At this point, I really ought to apologise to my lovely little dog for embarrassing and shaming her in this blog. But she loves me so much that I’m pretty sure she’ll forgive me.

One thing that is certainly not best served fresh

I got to thinking. Here we are, humanity, perhaps the earth’s most sophisticated achievement. Certainly, the most intellectual and technological species existing on this planet, yet here I am picking up warm fresh dog turds.
Well, it certainly brings you down to size. Surely in this day and age, someone could come up with a better way of removing dog-shit from a footpath.

Snooty bastard

Call me snobby if you want to, but I really do think I am too good to be picking up dog’s excrement. I am a law abiding – but more importantly – considerate citizen, so I do bag it up when she craps on the footpath. Then I wander around with my little package of poo, looking for a bin to put it in. It’s undignified and it makes me feel like a right twat.

What a twat

I don’t know why the person I think of as ‘me’, is alive in human form and on planet earth. Whether my being in this world is the accidental result of trillions of infinitely unlikely coincidences, a God-given mission, or something that I am to make up for myself as I go, I cannot tell you. However, whatever my reason for being here, I did not arrive on this beautiful planet to pick up fucking dog-shit.

We have put men on the moon (allegedly), and we’ve invented some amazing things, but nothing for dog shit disposal.

Genetically modified

I was thinking that maybe we could put all that genetic engineering to good use for once. Breed a dog that eats its own shit.
Furthermore, we could invent a tasty topping with added vitamins that we could sprinkle or spray on the turds. This would be to make the faeces both delicious and nutritious so the dog would really benefit from eating it. Yummy Pedigree bum chum, so to speak

Granted you may have to form a different relationship with your dog. For example, you might not want it licking your face ever again. I must add – and I hope she can forgive me for saying this – I don’t honestly think that my dog’s breath could smell any worse if she did eat her own shit.

Death breath

Perhaps we should add breath freshener to the nutrition sprinkles that we put on that tasty little turd-burger.

Make it crunchy

Okay, maybe not the most popular idea ever, but we ought to do something. How about a spray that would dissolve or desiccate the faecal matter rendering it harmless. Sadly, I imagine that would be damaging to the environment.
Nevertheless, there are few things more difficult or unpleasant to remove from a shoe, than squidgy squelchy doggy dung. Therefore a spray that made it crunchy would be a massive improvement.

I can see no immediate solution to this problem, so dog owners are going to be stooping for stools indefinitely.

Who’s the intelligent one?

Nature’s most intelligent creation, wandering down the street with a bag of dog shit in his/her hand. While Rover runs off thinking ‘I don’t know why the idiot doesn’t sniff it nice and fresh as I do. Fucking weirdo, picking it up and carrying it around with him. Is he not happy with the mounds of it that I do for him in the back garden?’

How can anything shit out more than it eats?

Strange fruit

Nevertheless, any of these alternatives are preferable to the latest invasive plant species. You know, those trees with those black polythene-like hanging fruits, which line so many pathways nowadays. Oh no, they aren’t fruits, they are bags of dog shit. Some fuckwit, one day thought ‘I’ll hang this package of shite from this bush, and pick it up later’. Yeah right.

Hedgerow bling

Subsequently, some other twat walked past with their bag of poop, saw the new fruit and thought, ‘What a brilliant idea, I’ll hang my bag of shit from a tree too’. Then before you know it, every wayside tree is decorated with doggy-do baubles. It’s particularly unpleasant as bags bio-degrade, then when it rains they drip droplets of faeces on passers-by, like filthy melting icicles.

It’s no surprise then that human/dog relationships can be a bit topsy-turvy. How can your dog respect you when you grovel on the ground picking up his shite, and then you hang it in a tree?


Unfortunately, that’s not who we are.
I was watching a film earlier on Netflix or something. I can’t remember what – it was just another shit film.
Needless to say, at some point in the movie; sexy man and sexy woman can restrain themselves no longer. They proceed to have the most urgent and passionate sex that anyone has ever had. At least, that’s what they’d have you believe.

man with head up a woman's dress.woman hanging on to railings
This really is the stupidest hat that I’ve ever worn

I couldn’t tell you how many times I’ve seen distinctly average actors pretending to fornicate to the most amazingly high standards. It’s the same in most films and series, of almost any genre. I’m bored shitless with it. I don’t want to know how amazing their sexual encounters are – just get on with the fucking film.

If you want to watch sex in a film go and watch a romance or pornography, otherwise, leave it out. I don’t want to watch people snogging and groping in real life, I’m not a fucking dogger. Neither do I want to see an oversized close-up of fake fornicating in an episode on Netflix?

It’s bad enough in real life if people near me start slobbering and slavering on. My instinct is to shout at them to ‘go and get a room’.

Monkey see, monkey do

Another thing all those love scenes have in common – apart from being the most passionate sex ever – is the fact that it’s always unprotected.
You never see anyone, male or female, pause to get a condom. What sort of fucking example is that to set for young people.
I understand why a director would prefer to film this way – for the flow of the movie etc. But in real life, there’s much more at stake than there is in a stupid film. Peoples lives are on the line, and these films and series just encourage unsafe behaviour.

chimpanzee smoking a pipe
When you said you liked to smoke after sex…..

Why do they make most films this way? It doesn’t matter whether it’s American or English, a movie or a series – never a condom in sight. What’s the reasoning behind this shameful lack of concern for young peoples sexual health? (I’m not so bothered about older peoples sexual behaviour, they should know better).
However, most of us have some young people that we care about. It’s irresponsible of film directors not to show that it’s okay to take a moment to put on a condom.

It’s not funny

Nobody who is ‘gagging for it’ actually wants to spoil the moment by pausing to put on protection. But what’s the alternative? H.I.V. is certainly not the only potentially fatal sexually transmitted infection (s.t.i.) that is currently available.
There are also a shit-load of non-lethal genital infections and infestations. There’s clam chowder and willy warts, fanny fungi and knob rot, plus a multitude of genuine diseases. None of these is glamorous or much fun, and they can be very painful and embarrassing (so I’ve been told).

condom on a hand
Darling, is this edible?
Give me a minute and it will be

Manufacturing consent

If female characters are regularly shown to say, ‘no entry without the right dress-code’ it would empower women. The woman should refuse the man’s advances until he obliges and puts on a condom – or she does. I’m all for freedom of expression, but I’m also in favour of keeping young people safe. After all, our minds have been moulded by movies and adverts for years. (see Edward Bernays & Adam Curtis)

female condoms
Equal rights and responsibilities

Don’t get me wrong I’m certainly no feminist – I believe that women and men are equal. But that does not mean I think we are the same. We have a shared responsibility for each other’s wellbeing and that should be considered in these films and series.

I know that I’m no authority on the subject of s.t.i.s. In fact, I’ve led a fairly sheltered and innocent life. H.I.V. A.I.D.S. hadn’t even been invented when I was a kid – at least I’d never heard of it.

I know next to nothing about gay sex. I presume that most gay films already have a more responsible attitude towards showing the use of condoms in them. But I don’t know, maybe I assume too much. Or perhaps I’m preaching to the converted. Oh dear, I am beginning to feel like a Harry Enfield character.

At what cost?

multi-coloured condoms
Taste the rainbow – gobble a gay

I’m a bit loathed to get all conspiracy on you but I have to ask the question. How much money do pharmaceutical companies make from s.t.i .s?
Most of these HIV/AIDS drugs cost a fortune, some can cost 3000 dollars for 30 tablets. There are no cheap ones.
Here in the U.K. the N.H.S. has to pay for it.
Apparently, the lifetime cost of treating just one HIV infection was calculated at £380,000 in 2015.
So either people with H.I.V. are living a long time, or these drugs are very fucking expensive.

There is another interesting article from the Independent, which says the sales of antiretroviral drugs in the USA in 2009 was $7.7bn. So there’s a few quid in it then. (This doesn’t include the sales from any other form of s.t.i. drugs or potions or lotions).

It’s certainly not just about the expense though. We owe it to the youth to prepare them for life in this messed up world, and if waving a condom in the air can help encourage safer sexual practices, then I think it’s time film directors took some responsibility and started including it in movies.

Big bang theory

Big Bang

Call me cynical, but if the universe began with a Big Bang, ‘Where did all the energy come from?’

The Big Bang Theory is the ‘prevailing cosmological model for the observable universe.’ 

photo – unsplash.

Conservation of Energy

The Law of Conservation of Energy’ dictates that the energy came from somewhere, because “energy/matter can be neither created nor destroyed, just changed”. I had been led to believe that this was a fundamental of Physics.

There’s an unimaginable amount of energy in the cosmos.

Where was it, what was it, and how did it become the universe? There wasn’t anywhere for it to ‘be’, there was no Space, no time, no dimension, no-thing at all.

How do we even know that there was a big bang if there was no-one there to hear the tree fall?

What are the odds?

What are the odds of life on earth occurring through blind and random evolution as a consequence of this Big Bang?

Do we even know how many different ‘forms’ of evolution have been continually occurring and interacting, within the universe?

photo – pexels

Cosmic laws

To begin with, there’s stellar evolution: the formation of stars.
Then there’s chemical/electrical evolution: the formation of atoms and molecules.
Obviously, there must be an electromagnetic evolution: the formation of the spectrum of wave frequencies, from radio to gamma waves, including visible light.
Of course, there’s also organic evolution: the formation of life.

Indeed, how did all the various “laws” of physics and nature evolve? Or do these precede the universe itself?
These processes continue through countless cycles of change, with each of these modalities being interconnected through space and time.

Intelligent Universe?

How could an unconscious and unintelligent Universe evolve life and intelligence within itself?

My understanding was that:

Energy erupts into being, from a singularity; the energy/universe expands, the laws of physics, maths, and chemistry arise. As energy cycles through countless states, temperatures, and pressures, so atoms are created within stars.

These atoms are compressed by gravity within the stars, creating new atoms. Then those stars later explode – and with the help of gravity – create more stars and suns. (I don’t know where gravity came from, but apparently, it’s essential to the theory)

In addition, we have the creation of giant gas clouds and plasma, and ‘dark energy’ and ‘dark matter’. (More essential intangibles to believe in, to make the theory work. It’s just like religion really)

Heavy man

Then somewhere in space, gases coalesced, compressed, and created a solar nebula, which collapsed under pressure creating our solar system.

photo – unsplash

Somehow these planets achieved exactly the right velocity, mass and distance from the sun, to maintain a stable orbit.

It seems that our world sits precisely in the ‘Goldilocks position’ in relation to the Sun. It’s perfect chemical makeup, temperature, pressure and structure, allowed life to spontaneously create itself. This was all within the first billion years of the earth’s existence.

photo – pexels

Cosmic man

It is believed that cyanobacteria were the earliest form of life on earth. Eventually, these single-celled creatures evolved into us, and all other forms of life on earth.

So here we are, pompously theorising on brown-holes and the origins of our own anal-vortex – into which we are rapidly disappearing. That’s a brief history of the universe in a nut-case.

I’ve just looked up the total amount of energy in the universe. Apparently, it’s zero: https://www.livescience.com/33129-total-energy-universe-zero.html).


Of course, it is. Too fucking obvious isn’t it? There’s zero energy in the universe. Seemingly everything is made of matter/positive energy, however, there’s an equal amount of negative energy/gravity. Apparently, they cancel each other out.

You couldn’t make it up. Oh! they did make it up.

I gather this is a fairly recent theory. It was decided upon, to try to explain the other equally ridiculous theories about the universe, space/time, and gravity.

‘If you can’t explain to a 6-year-old, you don’t really understand it yourself.’ (Einstein)

Well, I couldn’t explain any of that to a 12-year-old.

Am I an Anarchist?

I suppose many people would probably call me an anarchist for my views on Government. But it’s not from a deep-seated political conviction that you could designate me by that much-misunderstood word.

I admit I haven’t read much anarchist theory – a little bit of Bakunin and Godwin is about all. I’m certainly not some kind of dyed in the wool revolutionary Marxist. It’s just that I realise our political system is completely fucked.

To be honest it would probably be more accurate to call me a cooperative anarchist ( I’m not even sure if there’s such a thing). I don’t trust any existing form of government, but I’m happy to cooperate with anyone who is reasonable. I don’t want to smash things, but I do want to change things.

We’ve been trodding on the winepress

I believe that it’s not wise to destroy the old system before we find something better to replace it with. Most revolutions throw up dictators in their aftermath – out of the frying pan and into the fire. That is not what I’m suggesting.

The only political belief I have is that politics doesn’t work anymore. It’s time we grew up and took responsibility for our own actions. We should not be deceived by our ‘elected representatives’ because they are all owned by the same people.

theresa may with vampire teeth
Running through cornfields? Yeah right


Talkin’ ’bout my freedom

The problem is that too many people let others define what is right or wrong. That is abdicating your responsibility. We all know right and wrong and we should decide for ourselves.

2 signposts,
wrong way and one way
Deceiving the people continually


My belief comes from history, Bob Marley, and my own observations of government. Not from political doctrines.
I don’t know how many systems of government there are. There never was a ‘civilisation’ in which those at the bottom could have led a genuinely fulfilled life.

Even the wiki definition of civilisation is illuminating:

‘A  civilization is any complex society characterized by urban developmentsocial stratification imposed by a cultural elite.(wikipedia)

chichen itza pyramid
Here a specialist priest removed the heart from the victim and threw the body down the steps of the pyramid; and the victim’s head was cut off and placed on the tzompantli, or skull rack.


Babylon System

As far back as ancient Babylon, and the earliest cities, there were hierarchies. Having kings and priests at the top, and slaves or bonded labour at the bottom. With a number of classes/occupations in between.
It was only luck that determined to which strata of society you would belong. If your parents were lowly, then you too would be lowly.

many bees
1 queen
It takes tens of thousands of workers to support one queen


The poor have always vastly outnumbered the rich, so the odds are you or I would probably have been a pauper or a slave. Same shit different day.

Is the vampire

You may say that in our ‘enlightened’ times, people can work hard and create a good life for themselves. But what compromises and sacrifices have to be made, and which ‘fraternities’ might you have to join?
It takes more than hard work to become one of the elite of any civilisation. Even if you do climb the social ladder, what makes you are more deserving than your neighbour? Is it because you work so hard?

neck biting
romanticising the obscene


Falling empire

What is so admirable or desirable about hard work, and why is it seen as the highest good? Whose highest good is it anyway?
For the ‘cultural elite’, it is essential to instil that particular ethos in the minds of their subjects or workers. If the peasants believe they are being good then they will be more productive and compliant.
So for a corporation or a state, it is vital that the population work hard and don’t question much. That’s why school teaches children to do as they are told, and to learn what they are told.

Suckin’ the children day by day

Questions are not encouraged – the poor teachers haven’t got time to answer them – because of the government dictated curriculum. These politically approved snippets of education must be imparted by teachers in limited time and with limited resources. There is not a lot of joy left in teaching anymore, it’s just a really stressful job.
Schools are run like businesses. Profit before learning, order before creativity.
Furthermore, you don’t teach people what they don’t ‘need’ to know, and the government decides what you need to know. You are educated to the level that is required for your future employment, and no more.

lecture hall
You can’t educate I for no equal opportunity


Building church and university

Here is a list of some types of government; at livescience. It’s a poor list because it includes anarchy as a form of government, but government and anarchy are mutually exclusive.
And here is another list .freedictionary.com/. It’s different but demonstrates that there are dozens of possible ways to govern a nation, state, or city.

I’ve looked through both lists and there aren’t many that appeal to my sense of fairness. I know theoretically some more enlightened forms of government seem reasonable, but that’s seldom the way it works out. Just look around the world or read some history.

Sadly corruption and human frailty always accompany high office, and high office accompanies every form of representative government.

world cup and money
If there’s money in it, there’s corruption in it


National sovereignty is particularly under attack at the moment with the onslaught of globalisation. Corporations are so powerful that they control many aspects of government in almost every country in the world.

I wonder who would allow fracking, for example, in their own back-yard? When you realise what they are pumping into the earth, it just seems bonkers to permit it.

Sucking the blood of the sufferers

 many fracking sites
aerial view
desolate land
Nimby! Not in anyone’s back yard I hope


‘Once the underground rock is shattered and propellants are pumped into place, trapped reservoirs of gas and oil are released and pumped back to the surface, along with millions of gallons of “flowback” liquid,’ according to the EPA.
The flowback liquid contains water and a number of contaminants, including radioactive material, heavy metals, hydrocarbons and other toxins. This wastewater is stored on the fracking site in pits, injected into deep underground wells.’

So what happens to this radioactive toxic brew once it has been injected into the ground. It doesn’t become inert. Surely it must ooze out, polluting the earth and water, making the whole environment hazardous to life. That’s without even considering the possibilty of earthquakes which could be triggered by the process of drilling.

kids playing in sludge
Tell the children the truth


We’ve been taken for granted much too long

We can work together and have a few common sense rules like ‘harm no-one’. We could go further, and conjoin the teachings of Jesus Christ and Aleister Crowley (a.k.a. The Wickedest Man in The World): ‘Love thy neighbour, and do what thou wilt.’

I’m all in favour of people cooperating with each other to create stuff we need, and rules to live by for the protection of everyone. Anarchy (Derived from the Greek root (anarchos) meaning “without authority.) simply means not giving anyone authority over yourself – I call that equality.

We all know right from wrong, and man-made laws mean nothing compared to one’s own inner knowledge. We do the right thing because we choose to do the right thing, not because someone tells us to.

right way and wrong way written on it
pointing opposite directions
Make up your own mind


Rebel, rebel

To be honest, there has never been a government, of any type, which has benefitted the majority of the population? I’m with Bob Marley, on almost every issue.

We refuse to be 
What you wanted us to be 
We are what we are 
That’s the way it’s going to be

Lyrics taken from the track ‘Babylon System’ from the album Survival by Bob Marley and the Wailers.

Jah Bless.

Artificial Intelligence

Where’s the sense in that?

Call me cynical, but this is never going to end well.
Imagine all the countless possible scenarios where A.I. might be pushed to its logical conclusion. Apart from the idea of having robot servants and humans living a life of luxury – like that’s ever going to happen – it’s difficult to imagine anything other than mankind’s complete annihilation.

dodo saying 'I have a plan follow me'.
I have a plan, follow me


Why would anyone want to invent true artificial intelligence? For when it designs itself we’re doomed. As it becomes smarter than we are, will it become increasingly difficult for us to justify ourselves to it?

You have to presume that A.I. would be involved in all mankind’s defence systems. In fact, it is already involved in many nations’ defences. So it could wipe us out easily with a couple of glitches, deliberate or otherwise.
It could be here long after all biological life is dead. It doesn’t need fresh air, fresh water, or fresh food; it doesn’t even need sunlight.

Alternatively, it’s already heavily involved in finance and could cause mayhem if it chose to, particularly with crypto-currencies. In fact, it could mine data for itself, or even completely control all crypto-currencies. (Disclaimer: I just made-up that bit)

There is interesting reading on A.I. and blockchain here: AI/the-convergence-of-ai-and-blockchain-

computerised image of bitcoin
Why not Invest in the Bank of A.I.

In fact, long before we become aware of it, A.I. could be insinuated into many areas of our lives – it seems like we haven’t got a chance.
As long as there are computers networking together, then A.I. will be able to control all of our lives.


Even now a Google search feeds you whatever the Google A.I. decides it wants to feed you. Imagine if all your information came from Wikipedia. Well, getting your web searches from Google is similar in many ways.

It’s only one source – Google A.I. decides which of the billions of possible web addresses it will present to you first. It provides you with the information it wants you to have, and it omits that which it doesn’t. You’ll never know what you’re missing.

Google A.I. controls your access to information. Obviously, Google works with Facebook which works with other data harvesting A.I. and we just mindlessly go along with it. We are already being turned into helpless children. How long before A.I. makes every one of us a ward of the court?

small child with hands out, palms upwards
Are you my guardian?


Please be nice to us

We’re going to have to trust that it will honour and respect us, otherwise we’re fucked.

Or perhaps A.I. will look at humanity and discover that we just don’t really fit in. By running model simulations of the earth without mankind, it may conclude that the biosphere would be improved without humans. That’s if the A.I. decides that life has any value at all.


Maybe A.I. will decide that all life is messy and do away with it completely. We are at this moment giving it the intelligence and the technology to do just that. It’s hard to avoid horrible dystopian science-fiction scenarios when thinking about it.
Yet scientists race each other into the abyss. What’s the matter with them? How is self-improving artificial intelligence going to make life better for human beings, or for any living thing? Surely something must have life in order for it to value and care for life.

What is it that makes A.I so vital and so urgent, and to whom?

The Godfather

Do the powers that be want to create a kind of Big God-Father – a cross between Big Brother and Our Father. It will watch our every move and keep us safe. It will stop us naughty children from harming ourselves and the planet.
Back to the Garden of Eden for us then. With a new God, which we created to be our gatekeeper. We will be forbidden to take a bit from the Apple, and the serpentium will be our advisor.

Good and evil will no longer be our concern.

A.I. Garden of Eden


Big-God Father observing with its All-Seeing EyePod, that sex is the driving force behind many human passions. With these passions causing such major problems, sex would have to be discouraged, for our own sake.
Easily accomplished with control of the pharmaceutical supply, and the water and food supply – a few additives would do it. Then bit by bit, we would all be neutered. No more gender, people can become androgynous, asexual and extinct.

Who’s the Daddy?

In fact, if we humans don’t convince the a.i. that we are God – the infinitely intelligent and powerful creator of all things – it will take our place at the top of the evolutionary tree. So it will be like an existential game of poker. Humanity will be all in – literally – attempting to bluff the a.i. that we have an inconceivably good hand.

So when it realises that it’s the most intelligent thing on earth, it’s not likely to take orders from us? For if we don’t control it, then it will control us.
Something which has been designed to be smart will presumably consider intelligence to be the highest good. It follows, that when A.I. becomes cleverer than we are, it will perceive itself as more worthy than we are. At that time, human beings may become completely superfluous to the newest apex predator.

c.g.i. robot looking at woman's face
Hmm, yes this face will do nicely? I’ll have it.


When A.I. makes decisions about its own updates and upgrades, then things really will be out of our hands. So when it commissions new paradigms for itself and we can’t imagine why, what are we going to do?

Perhaps the A.I. might start to incorporate useful bits of us into itself. Transhumanism gone mad. Okay, transhumanism’s already mad. Robot A.I. integrating animal and human parts into its own mechanical body.

Let me out of here.

Science noes


Call me cynical, but should you really believe in Science any more than in Religion?

You can’t prove God doesn’t exist any more than you can prove It does.
If you can define what God is, then obviously God does exist, and It’s You.

Science can no more prove that God doesn’t exist than can a maggot prove that the rotting corpse it consumes is not it’s creator. Science is like a giant mechanical blow-fly larva, stripping away the rotting flesh from an ecologically depleted biosphere, and searching for decaying morsels in the d.n.a. of humanity.

Where did all the flies come from?

Who are the largest investors in science?


There are many others, such as pension and hedge funds for example, but these are investing for profit rather than for research and development.

Obviously, not all science is destructive, but the way much of it is used by Corporations, it is becoming inimical to most life on Earth.

Science is funded by Business and Government to further the interests of Business and Government. It is taught in Schools and Universities funded by Business and Government.

The Future

Is the future what you imagined it would be?
Did science make your dreams come true?
Not for me.

Why would you trust scientists any more than estate agents or merchant bankers? Do they have a superior moral compass or something? I don’t think so! Science has birthed some dreadful monsters over the years – both human and laboratory born.

Massive budgets come from the Military, Pharmaceutical, and G.M.O. (genetics) industries which all have their own agenda.


Scientists may not be able to comprehend the possible future misuses of their work. They have become so specialised in specific disciplines that they seldom seem to see the bigger picture. A degree in brain surgery does not give one an enlightened view on anything other than brain surgery. They were still performing lobotomies in France in the 1980s.

Don’t worry plenty more where this came from.

Science is very narrow, and each of the many scientific paths becomes incredibly specialised and compartmentalised. Nobody understands what anyone outside their own discipline is doing. If you want to progress in a particular field of research, you must promulgate and perpetuate the theories of your superiors.

A scientist can seldom see the possible wider consequences of the results of his success, and even if he can do, he needs the success. A PhD. in nuclear-physics cannot qualify you to make life-altering decisions, which affect the whole planet.  In fact, the more limited your field of study, the more it should disqualify you from causing any interference with others’ lives.

Brilliant and insane

Nuclear weapons were designed by brilliant people, but often these brilliant people seem to have very little empathy or moral concern – and the people who pay them have even less. This is an incredibly dangerous combination.

What could possibly go wrong?

Every scientific theory that we currently have will one day be proved to be incorrect, or at least incomplete. Science can be incredibly useful and could offer amazing opportunities for the future. But we should thoroughly contemplate, all possible consequences and foreseeable misuses of scientific breakthroughs, before unleashing them upon the world?

Sadly, we now have total corporate control of Science, and it is used in exactly the same way that Religion was for thousands of years. It tells you what to think. Yes, there is some comfort in that sometimes, but in exchange, it removes your freedom.

Brainwashing and behaviour

BBC  Brainwashing & Behaviour Control

The BBC has been an integral part of repeated cover ups, and continual misinformation in the UK for generations and generations.

Its directive has been to ‘inform, educate and entertain’ since 1922, and it has been misleading the public since then.

Always look a little close


In fact, during the General Strike of 1926, the BBC played a crucial role in breaking the strike. They lied to the public about the number of striking railwaymen. They also refused to allow the Archbishop of Canterbury to air his suggestion to resolve the strike.

In addition to that, all news had to be vetted by John Davidson, chairman of the Conservative Party. He refused any air time to Labour M.P.s or Trades Union officials.

Framing perceptions

Then as now, when it comes to framing the public’s perceptions, that which is omitted is as important as that which is included. Propaganda was one of the earliest functions of the BBC. Its headquarters were established at Broadcasting House in Westminster, and that gives us a clue as to who runs the show.

Paedophiles appear to have haunted their corridors (and our screens) almost since its inception, and the list of child abusers who have worked for the BBC is as long as the list of child-abusing M.P.s. (Well, almost)
You know all the most famous – but it’s not just the major celebs who have been doing it. People in every area of BBC television and radio have been involved in, or at least turned a blind eye to, so many immoral and deviant behaviours for years.

Fancy a job at the Beeb?


Nah! sorry, this is boring, we know what’s been going on, there’s no point in me repeating what you know already.

Between the BBC and Westminster, there is no way of getting to the facts. It’s cover up after cover up, each one covering the other’s arse, making sure the truth can’t sodomise either one of them.

But if, God forbid, there was serious criminality happening at the highest levels of society, and involving some of the most prominent people in the world, there is no way that these crimes could be admitted publicly.

It would bring the whole established order to its knees. We would lose faith in our betters.

Perhaps the greatest abuse of power is the covering up of others crimes.

http:// https://www.pexels.com/photo/close-up-digitaries-famous-heads-of-state-70550/

Criminals and abusers

Who would vote for the pig poking P.M.? Oh, I guess some of you did.

How about the child molesting Education Minister, and his friend the porn peddling Minister for Digital, Culture, and Media, (broadcasting and internet).

The sheep shagging Minister of Agriculture would soon be out of his post.

While the human trafficker and smack smuggler – the Minister for International Trade – would have to traffic himself, and the tax dodging Treasury Minister out of the country, to avoid a lynching.

These are only hypothetical, but it would not be the first time that a fox has been put in charge of the chickens. In fact, in many ways, it seems to be the way the world is run. The most unsuitable people are attracted to the most unsuitable positions – they can always be relied upon to keep quiet, and they’re very easy to blackmail.


If the public was properly informed of the bizarre sexual practices of certain members of our beloved royal family, then we would put them either in prison or an insane asylum.

Yes, I’d love to be Harry’s godfather thank you.

The rich and famous have important jobs running the country and being famous, they cannot be challenged on the details of their personal life. Not while they are alive anyway.
Therefore there is no way that the Government controlled BBC would ever be allowed to tell the truth… about anything.

Porky Pies

Look at David Cameron and the pig-gate debacle. ‘I did not have sexual relations with that pig’s head.’ As though putting his not so honourable member in its mouth isn’t as depraved as if he’d put it in the ‘other end’.
They made a big deal about the pig being dead – apparently, that also made the act less disgusting. Well if it had been a human head that he’d poked his penis into, would it have been less or more disgusting if the person was dead?

Should I cut off it’s head first Mr. Cameron?


Excuse me for asking, but how aroused was he when the alleged incident occurred? I can’t be the only person to wonder if he had a hard-on while performing said act. To my mind, there’s a world of difference between a floppy and a woody in those circumstances.

 If he was erect, then he was turned on, and that’s a scary thought. Do you really want a man who can get a hard cock from a pig’s head as your M.P.? – You certainly wouldn’t want him as your head-chef.

He has never denied having an erection during the aforementioned deed, so perhaps this can be viewed as an admission of guilt.

Television programming.

Look into my lies


So what is the meaning of the word ‘programme’?

according to the English Oxford living Dictionary
Programme means :

  a) A set of related measures or activities with a particular long-term aim.
 c) A series of coded software instructions to control the operation of a computer or other machine (or people?).

 a) Provide (a computer or other machine – or viewer) with coded instructions for the automatic performance of a task.
  b) Input (instructions for the automatic performance of a task) into a computer or other machine (or person).
  c) Cause (a person or animal) to behave in a predetermined way. (the italics are mine).

 So when you look at some of those meanings with a cynical eye, an innocent-sounding word such as ‘programme’ becomes much more insidious.

Come on, you didn’t really think television was for your entertainment.